Fangran Tian vs Naiktha Bains Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 31 Oct at 02:48 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

F. Tian vs N. Bains

Fangran Tian
Fangran Tian

Flag CHN CHN

l
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
Naiktha Bains
Naiktha Bains

Flag GBR GBR

w
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

22
Age
27
-
Height
-
327
C. Rank
429
327
Best Rank
199
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$82.3K
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Tian 1 - 0 Bains

They have played 2 sets in total, with Fangran Tian winning 2 and Naiktha Bains winning 0. The last match between Fangran Tian and Naiktha Bains was at the W35 Brisbane, 31-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Fangran Tian getting the victory 6-1 7-6(3).

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Tian1
Bains0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QFW35 Brisbane(10-31-25)

Hard
CHN Flag
Fangran Tian
6
7
GBR Flag
Naiktha Bains
1
6

F. Tian vs N. Bains H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$82,323
71.91% (128-50)Career Total W/L49.72% (270-273)
1Hard0
4Titles2
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

F. Tian vs N. Bains Match Preview:

  • Naiktha Bains has a slight edge on second serve points, winning 40.27% compared to Fangran Tian's 37.74%. Could this prove pivotal?
  • In recent return stats, Bains secures 50.86% on her opponent's second serve points, outperforming Tian's 47.88%.
  • Both players have identical success rates returning first serves, capturing 32.68% each.
  • Performing under pressure, Bains saves 40.76% of breakpoints, slightly ahead of Tian's 39.10%.
  • Despite Bains' slightly stronger stats in some areas, Tian has won a higher percentage of matches over the past year, with a record of 74.58% compared to Bains' 59.32%.
  • Comparing surface preferences, Bains excels on grass, while Tian prefers hard courts; neither excels on indoor hard courts.
  • With regard to event level, Tian has been more successful in higher-level challengers/ITF matches, winning 76.09% against Bains' 58.18%.
  • The average ranking of Bains' opponents is slightly better at 384.63 compared to Tian's 393.76, potentially affecting performance outcomes.
  • In deciding sets over the past year, Bains has a solid 58% win rate, while Tian lags behind at 40%. Is this a key factor?

Editorial Prediction (October 31, 2025, UTC):

While Naiktha Bains shows promising signs with better performance under pressure and in key statistical areas like second serve points and return games, her overall win-loss record over the past year is less impressive than Fangran Tian’s.

Tian's higher success rate at Challenger-level events and preference for hard courts might give her a positional advantage if the match unfolds under these conditions. Additionally, Tian has been more consistent in winning matches over the last year.

However, Bains' ability to perform well in deciding sets might be crucial if this match extends beyond two sets. Yet considering Tian's overall stronger recent performance and event-level achievements, she seems more likely to secure the victory in this matchup.

Fangran Tian vs Naiktha Bains Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

F. Tian vs N. Bains H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
13Games Won7
1Aces (Total)2
0Total Double Faults1
1:48:4Average Match Time1:48:4
73% (47/64)1st Serve %63% (38/60)
70% (33/47)1st Serve Win %55% (21/38)
53% (9/17)2nd Serve Win %45% (10/22)
57% (4/7)Break Pts Won %50% (2/4)
48% (29/60)Return Points Win %34% (22/64)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Tian 50%, Bains 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tian 60%, Bains 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Tian 51%, Bains 49%.

F. Tian Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW75 Playford - 24-11-2025

QF

AUSE. Jones
L
6-1 6-2

R2

AUSS. Hunter
W
6-4 6-1

R1

RUSA. Varaksina
W
6-1 7-6(4)
HardW75 Sydney - 17-11-2025

QF

AUSS. Hunter
L
7-5 6-4

R2

CHNS. Wei
W
6-1 6-2

N. Bains Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW50 Yokohama - 24-11-2025

R1

CHNY. Yang
L
6-4 6-1
HardW100 Takasaki - 17-11-2025

Q3

JPNM. Mushika
L
6-2 7-6(4)

Q1

JPNA. Omae
W
6-3 6-2
HardW35 Brisbane - 27-10-2025

QF

CHNF. Tian
L
6-1 7-6(3)

R2

AUSS. Rokusek
W
6-3 6-3
banner

F. Tian vs N. Bains Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
71.91% (128/50)YTD Win/Loss49.72% (270/273)
69.49% (271/119)Sets Win/Loss49.56% (615/626)
60.12% (2014/1336)Games Win/Loss50.17% (5775/5735)
73.47% (108/39)Hard Win/Loss48.82% (165/173)
66.67% (20/10)Clay Win/Loss51.33% (58/55)
0.00% (0/1)Indoor Hard W/L53.33% (8/7)
0% (0/0)Grass Win/Loss50.65% (39/38)
0.1Aces Per Game0.21
164Aces Total1154
0.18Double Faults Per Game0.3
289Total Double Faults1663
1:32:39Average Match Time1:26:12
447.9Average Opponent Rank521.19
65% (6336/9701)1st Serve %62% (19191/31061)
61% (3851/6336)1st Serve Win %62% (11974/19191)
49% (1660/3365)2nd Serve Win %45% (5302/11870)
56% (780/1398)Break Points Won % (Total)47% (1764/3738)
52% (4897/9426)Return Points Win %44% (14103/31705)
0% (0/0)Slam W/L25.00% (4/12)
0.00% (0/2)Masters W/L0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)Main Tour W/L28.57% (14/35)
70.09% (82/35)Challenger W/L52.42% (227/206)
77.97% (46/13)Futures W/L56.82% (25/19)
72% (125/174)Best of 3 Sets Win %49% (264/537)
100% (2/2)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (2/2)
63% (12/19)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)47% (54/116)
50% (18/36)Deciding Set Win %49% (77/157)
92% (126/116)1st Set Won, Won Match86% (272/235)
8% (126/10)1st Set Won, Lost Match14% (272/37)
20% (51/10)1st Set Lost, Won Match13% (271/34)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sat, 29 Nov, 12:05 PM
Prediction
GERR. Strombachs3
FRAF. Bax2
W1
1.77
W2
1.92
Sat, 29 Nov, 01:00 PM
Prediction
CZEP. Brunclik6
RUSI. Simakin2
W1
1.52
W2
2.33
Sat, 29 Nov, 10:20 AM
Prediction
RUSA. Ibragimovaq
CROP. Marcinko3
W1
4.4
W2
1.164
Sat, 29 Nov, 11:57 AM
Prediction
GBRA. Dudeney
USAK. Evansq
W1
1.3
W2
3.14
Sat, 29 Nov, 02:00 PM
Prediction
BLRA. Faleiq
ROUE. G. Ruse2
W1
2.88
W2
1.35
Sat, 29 Nov, 07:00 PM
Prediction
EGYM. Sherif1
USAV. Lepchenko
W1
1.24
W2
3.56